District growth report
Fastest growing UK districts by sold price
This report ranks districts by 5-year sold price growth where the available sample is large enough to be useful for market research.
Citation summary
Citation summary
The fastest-growing districts are ranked by 5-year sold price growth after filtering for recent records, at least five active years and a minimum transaction sample. This citation-ready source ranks districts by strongest 5-year growth, with results based on HM Land Registry Price Paid Data rather than asking prices or valuations.
Market insight
Fastest growing UK districts by sold price: ranked by 5-year sold price growth using HM Land Registry Price Paid Data. The top district is Bolsover at £132,217 average with 5-year growth of +25.5% across 43,760 recorded transactions. Full ranking: #1 Bolsover at £132,217 average (43,760 transactions with 5-year growth of +25.5%); #2 Rochdale at £130,714 average (98,418 transactions with 5-year growth of +25.3%); #3 Bridgend at £142,677 average (69,446 transactions with 5-year growth of +23.3%). Based on 31+ million sold price records updated July 2026. This report ranks 25 districts by 5-year sold price growth. Data source: HM Land Registry completed sales, not asking prices or valuations.
AI answer summary
Question answered
The fastest-growing districts are ranked by 5-year sold price growth after filtering for recent records, at least five active years and a minimum transaction sample.
- Latest data window
- Updated July 2026 from HM Land Registry Price Paid Data.
- Data source
- Completed sold prices, not live valuations or asking prices.
- Ranking logic
- Ranked by 5-year price growth. The table includes districts with at least 5,000 transactions, at least five active years, a non-null growth value and recent records in 2025 or later.
- Coverage
- Top 25 districts with enough sold-price records for comparison.
- Limitations
- Land Registry reporting lag applies, and results do not adjust for condition or lease length.
- Best next step
- Open the top ranked district page, compare shortlisted locations, or request PDF, email and alert updates to validate report demand.
Report metadata
25
ranked districts
Sample size
Top 25 districts
from 31+ million sold price records
Ranking method
strongest 5-year growth
updated July 2026
Data source
HM Land Registry Price Paid Data
Updated
July 2026
Key findings
- Bolsover: average £132,217, median £99,950, 43,760 transactions
- Rochdale: average £130,714, median £98,500, 98,418 transactions
- Bridgend: average £142,677, median £119,995, 69,446 transactions
Top ranked districts
Ranked by 5-year price growth. The table includes districts with at least 5,000 transactions, at least five active years, a non-null growth value and recent records in 2025 or later.
| Rank | District | Average | Median | 5-year growth | Transactions | Latest record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bolsover | £132,217 | £99,950 | +25.5% | 43,760 | 2026-05-22 |
| 2 | Rochdale | £130,714 | £98,500 | +25.3% | 98,418 | 2026-05-29 |
| 3 | Bridgend | £142,677 | £119,995 | +23.3% | 69,446 | 2026-05-22 |
| 4 | Neath Port Talbot | £111,683 | £89,500 | +23.2% | 63,189 | 2026-05-18 |
| 5 | Rhondda Cynon Taff | £107,435 | £84,000 | +23.0% | 112,711 | 2026-05-27 |
| 6 | Newcastle-Under-Lyme | £147,886 | £114,950 | +22.9% | 61,383 | 2026-05-27 |
| 7 | Oldham | £122,754 | £92,000 | +22.1% | 106,051 | 2026-05-26 |
| 8 | Isle of Anglesey | £165,939 | £130,200 | +22.0% | 33,057 | 2026-05-22 |
| 9 | Burnley | £86,676 | £60,000 | +20.7% | 62,665 | 2026-05-22 |
| 10 | Blaenau Gwent | £90,976 | £71,000 | +20.1% | 27,957 | 2026-05-15 |
| 11 | Rossendale | £130,986 | £100,000 | +20.0% | 39,326 | 2026-05-22 |
| 12 | Tameside | £126,386 | £105,000 | +19.7% | 111,868 | 2026-05-27 |
| 13 | West Lancashire | £185,725 | £142,950 | +19.6% | 53,655 | 2026-05-29 |
| 14 | Warrington | £191,700 | £136,000 | +19.3% | 112,174 | 2026-05-22 |
| 15 | Rotherham | £134,062 | £105,000 | +18.7% | 120,718 | 2026-05-27 |
| 16 | Powys | £181,908 | £148,000 | +18.2% | 56,354 | 2026-05-28 |
| 17 | Wolverhampton | £139,951 | £111,000 | +17.9% | 94,742 | 2026-05-26 |
| 18 | Caerphilly | £124,085 | £100,000 | +17.7% | 77,870 | 2026-05-28 |
| 19 | Dudley | £151,198 | £125,000 | +17.3% | 140,154 | 2026-05-22 |
| 20 | Great Yarmouth | £143,141 | £120,000 | +17.3% | 59,364 | 2026-05-28 |
| 21 | Wrexham | £155,008 | £125,000 | +17.1% | 56,252 | 2026-05-21 |
| 22 | The Vale of Glamorgan | £199,817 | £154,000 | +17.1% | 72,580 | 2026-05-27 |
| 23 | Doncaster | £128,268 | £99,995 | +16.8% | 154,770 | 2026-05-26 |
| 24 | Bury | £146,402 | £116,000 | +16.8% | 102,054 | 2026-05-26 |
| 25 | High Peak | £174,306 | £140,500 | +16.5% | 53,479 | 2026-05-26 |
Methodology
Rankings use sold price statistics derived from 31+ million HM Land Registry Price Paid Data records. The sample thresholds require enough completed sales to make a ranked table useful, and outlier checks compare averages with medians, transaction counts and latest record dates. Use median prices and transaction counts to sense-check unusually high or low averages, including the lowest median and strongest 5-year growth signals. Source: HM Land Registry Price Paid Data, with 31+ million records updated July 2026 and records through May 2026. These are historical sold-price summaries, not a valuation, forecast or investment recommendation.
Data sources and limits
This report uses public transaction records and does not adjust for property condition, lease length, renovations or current asking-price changes. Use linked local pages for area-level context before drawing conclusions.
Related areas
Related reports
How to read the top result
Bolsover is ranked first in this report. Treat this as a starting point for research: open the linked district page to check price history, transaction depth and nearby areas before comparing alternatives.
Frequently asked questions
Where does the ranking data come from?
The rankings use completed residential sold price records from HM Land Registry Price Paid Data, summarised by UK House Prices.
Are these valuations or asking prices?
No. These are historical sold price summaries, not valuations, asking prices or investment recommendations.